Sunday, January 24, 2016

Good Books To Read - a list complied by my eleven year old daughter that I happened to find lying about

A Series of Unfortunate Events by Lemony Snicket
Smile, Drama and Sisters by Raina Telgemeier
Scott Pilgrim by Brian Lee O'Malley
Welcome to Night Vale by Jseoph Fink and Jeffrey Cranor
Magik by Angie Sage
Sh*t My Dad Says by Justin Halpern
Guards, Guards!, Wyrd Sisters, Lords and Ladies, Hogfather, A Hat Full of Sky and Men at Arms by Terry Pratchett
Baby Mouse and Squish by Jennifer Holm and Matthew Holm
Garfield by Jim Davis
The Story of Ferdinand by Munro Leaf
Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll
The Terrible and Wonderful Reasons why I run Long Distances by Matthew Inman
Grimm Sisters by Michael Buckley
Harry Potter by J K Rowling
A Hero's Guide to Saving Your Kingdom by Christopher Healy
Whip It by Shauna Cross
Lady Cottington's Pressed Fairy Book by Terry Jones and Brain Froud
My Name is Mina by David Almond
Bone by Jeff Smith
Jinx by Sage Blackwood
The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaimen
Slapstick by Kurt Vonnegut
A House Called Awful End by Philip Ardagh by Christianna Brand
Dying to Meet You (43 Old Cemetery Road) by Kate Klise

Thursday, December 31, 2015


Boxing Day I came home, arms laden with heavy bags, and confess to my husband that I have maxed out our cards.  

“All of them?” The Man asks doubtfully.

“Yes.  Even the children's.”

“Good for you!” he grins and gives me a high five.

I confess, this is not the first time I’ve maxed out a library card.  And the library card of anyone foolish enough to let me ‘hold on’ to theirs.  I carry four cards, one for each member of our household, excluding felines.  Each card has a limit of fifty items, a limit I am still a slightly irked about.  

A few years ago, we could take out up to ninety-nine items on a card, but some bureaucratic joining up with other libraries and making everything consistent bullshit happened (I’m not sure what the help desk lady said, actually, when I demanded and explanation, I too busy being offended to listen to the probably reasonable answer) and all I knew is that forces beyond my control were tinkering with something I consider to be my personal bookland.  It always irritates me when the powers that be remind me that I am not the Grandmaster Library Overlord.  

But even when the limit was ninety-nine, I still maxed out the library cards regularly.

I am mostly not ashamed.  

I suppose I had to think sort of feel a bit pathetic when I was standing there with forty-three books at home and another fifty-six checked out and put into bags, and one last book on the counter that I was trying to convince the clerk to make an exception on.  Because book number one hundred seemed like the one I couldn’t actually live without.  All the while, overheated two small children wrapped in full winter gear pulled on my arms, begging to please be released from the steaming hot library. I did start to feel like I might be overreaching slightly.  Like my eyes are bigger than my brain.  A book junkie?  Could I have a problem?

No.  The solution to having to prostrate myself to indifferent (disdainful?) library clerks was to make sure that I had my husband’s library card with me as well, and apply for a card for each of my two small, overdressed children.  Without photo id, the cats’ need for paperbacks and books on tape was dismissed by the clerk.  Also, nobody puts on their jackets and toques now until after the check out.

I could probably talk for hours on why I feel that I need to take home so many books at one time.  But who has hours to chit chat when there is so much reading to be done?  I can just summarize by saying that an unread book, no matter what genre or subject, looks like a kindred spirit.  I just know that possibility, adventure, and the most amazing thing I will ever learn and will probably make my life a thousand times better is just inside those pages.  It’s what I imagine lotto players feel like when they buy tickets to the next multi-million dollar draw.  The answer to all my problems! All the things that could be!  That is the seduction of new (borrowed) books.  

And why wouldn’t I think that?  Alright, I still have problems, but I have read some incredible books that have changed by life for the better.  I have read some real stinkers too, but they never let down either.  Badly written books make me feel connected with a person I have never met.  The author of a book that readers do not like, or worst, feel indifferent too, is someone I can relate to.  Don’t stress it author, I think. Lord knows I’ve done some dumb shit too.

So, unlike the most players of the lottery, my hopeful (temporary) three times a week acquisition of library books do not eventually disappoint.  As long as I make the effort to open the cover, the book works.  Not like Wi-Fi or furnaces or children, the books keep trucking along, delivering their wares as more or less promised on the sleeve or back cover.  The only thing that bums me out about a book is when there is no author photo.  I really like to know who wrote that particular stinker.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

a short list of places where I have read books

In bed, at the kitchen table, on the couch, in the bathtub, on the toilet, sitting on the floor, laying on the floor with my legs up the wall, in a closet, in the yard on lawn chairs, picnic tables, tree limbs, in the grass, on dirt, on an ant hill

- the ant hill was actually an accident.  I did mean to sit by the nice little mossy area and was quite comfortably reading along when a leggy little black mark wandered from the top left of the even page, worked its way down to the right, across the binding and back up to the top and over the edge.  A page later, another leggy black mark tripped itself over the words.  And then another.  And another.  Pulling my eyes away I noticed that I had hundreds of ants crawling all over me.  I made quite sure that none were trapped in the book before slamming it shut, jumping up and having a major spaz -

at the library, at school, at a cafe, in a park, at the beach, in a forest, on a mountain top, on the city bus, on a Greyhound, on an airplane, on a ferry

- when I lived on Vancouver Island and regularly took ferries to visit friends I always looked forward to the ride.  Ferries, as wonderful and necessary as they are when you live on an island, do constitute a bit of investment time-wise.  Two, three, four hour trips were normal.  After a quick look about in order to feel like I've done my duty to appreciate nature (trees on the coast, water underneath, boats passing by: check) I would crack open a book and read for hours without interruption or guilt that I should be doing something else.  Because what else could I really be doing while on a ferry?  (Don't answer that.)  I enjoyed this time so much that, after awhile, I began to wonder if I was traveling to visit or using the excuse of a visit to travel... and read -

in a camper, in the backseat of a car, the passenger side, the driver's side (while waiting with the car off), while hitch-hiking, in dentist's and doctor's offices, at the optometrists while waiting for an appointment and waiting to get my glasses back (with the book very close to my nose), while in labour, while operating an ATV

- it's true.  I have read books, many books, while driving a quad round and round an abandoned horse race track in a small town I lived in while in grade school.  There were few hazards, the quad was made for children and did not go too fast, the dirt track was predictably oval and devoid of any animal life other than the occasional gopher.  I was about 12 years old and I'm pretty sure I did it because it drove my mother nuts.  She'd say, 'Don't read while your riding that thing!  You're going to kill yourself!'  If she'd of known that it was only when I was paying full attention while driving, trying to do silly tricks and take jumps with the quad, that I was in any real danger.  Once again, reading kept me out of trouble -

at work, while on a treadmill, stationary bike, elliptical machine, stair master (but never managed the rowing machine), in the rain, while drunk, stoned, depressed, happy, and during commerical breaks on television. 

Monday, July 11, 2011



My six year old girl child, is learning how to read. I am generally letting her get on with it, not particularly concerned with how fast she is moving from illiterate to scholarship, but I am running a lot of interference with others who have more defined ideas about how much she should go about the business of learning to read.

However well-meaning yet unwanted the personalized ‘help’ with the reading is, the reading programs or ‘adventures in literacy’ as they sometimes bill themselves, have chiefly provoked my ire. Particularly suspect are summer reading programs hosted by libraries. We have steered clear of any reading done under the promise (or threat) or incentives. But now, as the summer reading program is once again underway at our public library and our reading of Lemony Snickett’s Series of Unfortunate Events has been interrupted by the sudden increase in juvenile patrons annoying borrowing the next book in the series out from under us, I am wondering if my reading program ire needs be provoked. Perhaps I have unfairly judged the programs?


The reading programs offer sticker and free books as rewards for a certain amount of books read. This is what is called extrinsic motivation, otherwise known as a bribe. I have read somewhere (a suspicious phrase, I know, but bear with me) that all children have an internal drive to learn to read in the same way that they will learn to walk and talk. Given enough time, raw materials, opportunities to ask questions and literacy experiences (such as being read to out loud), most children will teach themselves to read. If, however, you offer an extrinsic reward (stickers and books) for a naturally intrinsically motivated activity (reading for pleasure and learning), the extrinsic motivation will replace the intrinsic. The focus on the shiny external reward murders the quiet inner drive. Eventually, in a reward based reading program, children will begin to read only for the prize. Reading will become a chore to do before they can move onto the good stuff. Consequently, after grade school, already doing the minimal amount of reading they can get away with, using Cliff Notes and illicit internet essays to grimly squeak through literature classes, they cease all reading except celebrity gossip and spend their free time watching reality television.

Now that I type it all out, I suspect the initial culprit for this theory may be John Holt with my own particular brand of paranoia overlaid. As a new parent and, I admit, a particularly insecure one, I tended to swallow these kinds of theories reflexively. My daughter was born with a congenital heart defect and I had what seemed to be a vast amount of time to sit in hospital chairs, watch her sleep fitfully, and to read great tracts of parenting literature. Feeling maudlin and frightened at the invasive medical start to my child’s life, I began to lean heavily upon the editorial content of Mothering Magazine, a ‘natural’ family monthly, from which the glossy pages with pictures of shiny, healthy babies soothed my troubled heart. When facing these sorts of life and death situations with your own child, there is no such thing as critical thinking. At that point, among the magazine pages, I was looking for something to believe in. Natural family living became my religion.

A discussion for another day, perhaps, is how attempting to parent ‘naturally’ has recreated some difficult and guilt soaked situations for our family, often pitting me against my husband, extended family and, sometimes, my children. It is through these struggles, however, that the theories that I so naively, unquestionably, melded to my synapses during my daughter’s infancy come into the light and reveal themselves as just one way of thinking and, given that life is not conducted in a sunny field of organic poppies, not necessarily the best way.


When one of the things that I think I know about children becomes inconvenient, either by the way in which I want or must live my life or through embarrassingly overwhelming evidence to the contrary, my latent reserves of critical thinking once again dryly grind back to work and I am able to shake off some of the more rigid and unforgiving rhetoric of the natural family movement.

And here we are at the actual question: Does extrinsic motivation destroy an innate love of reading?

I don’t know.


But I do remember learning how to read myself. I was six years old, in grade one. There was a poster size chart on the wall with the names of my classmates in a column, a row of boxes beside each name. Inside each box was either a star or emptiness. Each star represented a book read or pretended to be read.

I recall encountering our first reader books, of ten or less words, and being rendered inarticulate with frustrated tears and misery. I believed I was never going to master this perversely difficult task, the connection between sound and character was elusive and devilishly irresolute. Each evening, slogging through the assigned reading, became known to me as the hour of torture. I hated reading.

Every day at school there were those who had completed their reading and those who had not. Each child with a finished book to hold up was given a coveted star sticker to place with their own hand on the chart. Before long, the poster visually revealed an intellectual hierarchy among the rows. Most names had only two or three stars attached, a few sad cases had none, and there were just a couple of names with a dozen or more bright shiny stars trailing behind like comets.

Looking at my two stars in the row directly beneath the name of that girl with the clipped tone and neatly combed hair who parked her colour coordinated pencils and novelty erasers in the shape of animals at the front by teacher and never got in trouble for playing rough games with the boys at recess. She who had a virtual universe of stars lined up stately behind her name. Under her and her stars, with my messy hair and boring pink erasers, each of my spaces sat empty as an accusation of idiocy.

I cannot say that this is the time that the world of knowledge suddenly became open and interesting to me, but it is when my intellectual competitiveness became strong enough to overcome the inertia of my general slackertude. It was that girl and her smug fucking stars that motivated me to push away my helpless tears and put my game face on.


I worked harder than ever before to learn the sounds and words, memorizing and puzzling and fitting it all together into a finally coherent message about throwing balls and running dogs. Every night I sweat and cried still, yet I did keep picking away at the clues until I finally found myself not only reading the words but actually comprehending the message.

This is also when I realized that many of the readings given to children for study at school was vacuous fluff, but that is, also, a discussion for another day.

I do not think I ever caught up to Miss Snotty Stars but I know I managed to pack away quite a few books that year. Enough to earn me the title of a ‘smart girl’, an honour and accusation that haunts me to this day. Whatever else happened with my social aspirations, extrinsic motivation – stars and prestige - is what got me reading. So what has become of my intrinsic drive?


Today I am a voracious and incorrigible reader. No matter how much I complain that I have no time for anything, I still manage to zip through two or more books a week. That is because I make room for reading the same way that I make room for bathroom breaks. It is just something that I have to do. Otherwise terrible things will happen. Nobody makes me read and, if I am truly honest, my house would be cleaner and my children neater if I took up television watching instead. Yet here I am, the readingest reader I know.

Perhaps I am an exception but I suspect that the case between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation is not clear cut. Each works to encourage or undercut one another, given the proclivity of each person’s individual brain chemistry and general disposition towards authority, and it is best not to make definitive statements about the right or wrong way to learn to read.


I have yet to sign up my daughter for the summer reading program. This year, given my girl’s dislike of pressure or score keeping, we will skip it, although when next June rolls around I will have to give it some serious thought. Perhaps she will enjoy keeping track of the number of books she had read and enjoy periodic reinforcement in the shape of a free book from a commercial enterprise such as Scholastic who sponsors such programs. It is just as likely that she will start to glean over the words and book to rack up the points in order to show up some other pint-sized Type-A.

The real question now is, what will you give me to find out?